Rearranging the deck chairs on the Natural England Titanic.

Natural England chairs come and go, and today’s publication of the advert inviting applicants to be the next chair, gives me an opportunity to look, once again, at the absolute state of Natural England.

Some may feel all I do is bash Natural England whenever I write about them. As if NE-bashing was my favourite past-time. Nothing could be further from the truth – just yesterday morning I was defending Natural England from a demented attack by a Tory buffoon. I am often critical of Natural England – not because I want rid of a public body which protects nature, like some certainly do. But because above all else I want to see a strong regulator, working its collective arse off, for nature, in England. There are still plenty of people in Natural England doing exactly that, but every day, every little thing, makes their job a little more difficult.

Let’s look at a few examples of these little things.


For instance the recent appointment of Lord Blencathra as deputy chair of Natural England. Lord Blencathra is a Tory peer, who was previously a Minister. He was deeply involved with the 1992 Rio Summit, so, we must surmise, he has a genuine interest in environmental matters. He is also a very enthusiastic supporter of hunting. Some have suggested that he took his peerage name from his local hunt, the Blencathra Hunt. I can find nothing to confirm or deny whether this is true. But what is clear is that he provided detailed advice and support for the Countryside Alliance during the passage of the Hunting Bill through Parliament. Their aim was to make the legislation as weak as possible, allowing hunting to continue under the radar, making it difficult for prosecutions to succeed. And this is exactly what has happened. Blencathra was previously put forward as chair of the Food Standards Agency but had to step back when the proposal was criticized as a political appointment. He was also severely criticized for taking employment as a lobbyist for the tax haven Cayman Islands. He avoided more serious action by claiming that he had never actually done any lobbying of his fellow Lords (though he had lobbied MEPs.)

Some have asked why the appointment of a leading pro-country sports Lord to deputy chair of Natural England’s board is even worth mentioning. And in mentioning it I have been accused of all sorts of dark activities, including “ethnic cleansing.” Honestly, country sports people, do grow a backbone. The point is not whether Blencathra loves hunting or not, its whether his love of hunting and other blood sports conflicts with the purpose of Natural England. One particular purpose of Natural England, for example, is as a regulator which job is to make sure laws protecting wildlife are taken seriously. Laws protecting species like Hen Harriers, and laws protecting internationally important habitats like blanket bogs.

Grouse Training

As if by magic, and purely coincidentally of course, news seeps out that Natural England staff are being educated on the environmental benefits of driven grouse shooting, on a grouse moor whose head keeper was prosecuted and fined for err setting illegal traps for birds of prey like err Hen Harriers. Natural England does need to work with the owners of SSSIs and European Sites on Driven Grouse Moors (while the latter exist, anyway.) But what I find deeply worrying is the idea that NE and owners of grouse moors are to be seen as partners, that NE should be “customer-focused” above all else. And if you think that’s wrong, go back to the top of the post and read the tweet from Natural England, describing what the role is about. I don’t even believe Natural England should be considering SSSI owners as customers. It’s not a shop! Natural England, above all else, is a regulator, whose job is to see the law effectively applied. There is no other regulator with that job. There is no-one else that nature can turn to, metaphorically, to ask for help. There is only Natural England. And if NE is too busy seeing how vital it is for grouse-moor owner’s to burn blanket bog, then it’s much less likely to take legal action against them to stop it.

Judicial Reviews

Natural England’s willingness to roll over and play dead when it comes to implementing the laws protecting our wildlife, has got so bad, even the RSPB is taking legal action against them, as is Mark Avery. Another Judicial Review against Natural England was recently rejected. This one focused on Natural England’s failure to consider the effect of badger culling on European Sites supporting scarce and vulnerable ground-nesting birds, feeding grounds for wildfowl and non-breeding roosts of rare raptors such as hen harrier. European Sites (Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of Conservation) have very strict legal protection – thanks to the EU. This means any project which might have an impact on the species and habitats for which those sites were designated, has to be assessed – the so-called Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA). The claimant pointed to several instances where Natural England had failed to carry out HRAs looking at whether the badger cull would lead to, for example, a change in the fox population. Or the well-established perturbation effect, whereby culling badger causes surviving badger colonies to disperse away from their home areas. In a surprise judgement, the Judge decided that although Natural England had breached its duties under the Habitats Regulations, he was satisfied that they would have concluded that the badger cull would have had no impact on the nearby European Sites anyway, even without the proper assessments. Natural England appear to have relied on a reference to “routine monitoring” of protected sites, but their monitoring programme has suffered serious funding cuts so they don’t even know what state the sites are in, or whether the special species and habitats on them are doing ok, or have disappeared altogether. I understand an appeal is being considered.

Cuts and Reassignments

If I’m painting a picture of an organisation in crisis, which has lost all sense of identity, and purpose, perhaps you’re thinking this picture is as black as one of Goya’s black paintings, or reminds you of a particularly dark film noir. But I leave you with one further piece of evidence. Sue Everett reports in this week’s British Wildlife, that 200 NE staff are to be “reassigned” to work on “Brexit duties”. What she means is that 200 NE staff are being taken away from NE and transferred to Defra. Requests for volunteers have only resulted in 65 willing to make the sacrifice, so the word is that the others will be compulsorily reassigned. These are secondments, but who in their right mind would really believe they were going to return to NE in 2 years time? Still, reducing the head-count will enable NE to meet its ongoing budget cuts. These cuts, which have gradually been paring away at NE’s body since 2010, follow on from the transfer of staff working on countryside stewardship, which I wrote about earlier this year.

The picture is an ugly one. Natural England is failing in its role as the statutory regulator for nature. It’s struggling against a rising tide of pressure from Defra and elsewhere not to rock any boats, especially with powerful vested interests like the Countryside Alliance. And its budgets and workforce are cut and cut again, making those that are left increasingly despondent.

Who then would be interested in taking on the role of chairing this failing organisation?

Given this Government’s previous record of getting away with political appointments,  I predict we’ll see someone rewarded with a sinecure. It may be Lord Blencathra who is given the nod to slip from deputy chair into the chair role. He would certainly do Defra’s bidding without any dissent. Or it could be someone like Rob Wilson, who failed to get the Charity Commission chair because it was such a blindingly obvious political appointment. The outgoing chair had close links with Policy Exchange, Gove’s thinktank. So we could see another horse from that stable. The choice is academic though.

I think it’s time we all agreed that Natural England’s time has come and gone. We need to start afresh. After Brexit, after the chaos of a crash-out no-deal no food on the supermarket shelves Brexit, after the smoke has cleared, it will be time to start rebuilding.




About Miles King

UK conservation professional, writing about nature, politics, life. All views are my own and not my employers. I don't write on behalf of anybody else.
This entry was posted in Andrew Sells, badgers, countryside alliance, Europe, Habitats Directive, Natural England, SSSis, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Rearranging the deck chairs on the Natural England Titanic.

  1. You could say the same for SNH.

  2. Peter Smith says:

    Excellent analysis Miles – I have gone way past despondency myself many years ago – There are still a few good people, but they are few and far between. we should of course send our CVs in as I am sure I we are just what they are looking for 😉

  3. You could say the same for PHSO – the Ombudsman. All regulators work the same way, tied to the government’s apron string. #corruptbydesign

  4. Margaret says:

    I remember how the Countryside Alliance tried to sabotage any reform of Countryside access for the public…. It was said of the 2000 Access to the Countryside Act, Ramblers want to walk through your from garden!!!!! Why would anyone want to do that when what was asked for was access to open land.. commons etc.
    All common land is owned by someone and not much was open land, it is now……!

  5. Diana Westerhoff says:

    It all goes to show that NCC and EN were too successful. They did what the law asked them to do the powerful landowners didn’t like it.

    • John Bradfield says:

      English Nature was dreadful. It failed to recognise the glaringly obvious features of an ancient woodland near Knaresborough. Amateurs were criticised behind the scenes, for arrogance in daring to challenge EN.. It finally relented and declared the woodland a SSSI., a few weeks before a bypass was sliced through its centre. That would never have happened, if EN staff had not been so dreadfully incompetent and/or working to the wrong agenda. In the same area, it gave such bad advice, over what was then the largest known population of legally protected great crested newts in the country, that amateurs accurately predicted that EN would be responsible for forcing the collapse of that population. Natural England has remained silent over the issue but endorsed a planning application to build 175 house in the habitat. NE must think the best way to help great crested newts, is to keep adding more and more hundreds of permanent death traps, in the form of rainwater and other drains, from which there is no escape. For more information see comments after the report about Chris Packham’s call for us to stand and be counted:-

  6. Pingback: Nearly half of England’s ‘most important wildlife sites’ at risk | Eco Bio III Millennio

  7. Pingback: Unicorns in Brexitland: Panto seasons starts early this year | a new nature blog

  8. Pingback: New Board members for Natural England: the banker, the mandarin, the natural capitalist and the media exec. | a new nature blog

Leave a Reply to Peter Smith Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.