The Nitrogen Dilemma

The Haber-Bosch process has transformed global food production

Are humans, and everything we do, part of nature? Or have we evolved to the point where what we do is no longer considered “natural”? This might seem like a philosophical question, but the answer to it has a great bearing on our future, as individuals and as a species.


Geologists are already talking about a new epoch created by humans – the anthropocene. And, as an illustration of that, a piece of research that’s just been published calculates that farmed poultry makes up 70% of all the world’s birds, and that only 4% of all the mammals on the earth now are wild – ⅔ are livestock and ⅓ humans.

One the biggest factors that has helped drive this transformation is our ability to break out of our ecological niche. Every species has a niche which determines how and where it can live. That niche includes things like the ideal temperature and how much water we need to survive, plus what we use for food, and how we interact with other species.

Growing our own food (farming) instead of collecting it from wild sources certainly was a big step towards that break-out  -al though a few other species also carry out forms of farming – ants manage aphids to produce honeydew in a similar system to dairy farming, and also cultivate fungus gardens.

Perhaps the biggest step out of our niche in recent times, has been the ability to directly create reactive Nitrogen. Nitrogen is one of the fundamental building block elements of life – without Nitrogen there would be no protein, no DNA. Life, as we know it, wouldn’t exist.

Where there’s Life – there’s nitrogen

And Nitrogen is all around us – 78% of the planet’s atmosphere is Nitrogen, so every breath you take is basically Nitrogen, though you wouldn’t know it. That’s because it’s bound up in an inert form of two Nitrogen atoms joined together – sometimes called di-Nitrogen.

In order to be available for life, di-Nitrogen has to be split apart to create reactive Nitrogen atoms – which are chemically unstable. These atoms want to form stable molecules so will very quickly combine with other atoms to form things which are very useful for life – things like Nitrate and Ammonia.

Before life evolved, and even now, a great deal of Nitrogen in the atmosphere is broken up into reactive Nitrogen as a result of Lightning, where very high temperatures break apart those inert Nitrogen molecules. And this is where the first life forms got their Nitrogen.

But very quickly this source was not enough to feed life, which then evolved the ability to mimic lightning’s effects, through the creation of a special protein (or family of proteins) called enzymes – we call them Nitrogenases. The bacteria (and similar microbes) with Nitrogenase are known as Nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Without them life would not have evolved to the point where humans appear. Fast forward a few billion years to the 19th century: Human populations had grown vastly, but were struggling to produce enough food to feed all the human mouths.

Farming was still dependent on those N-fixing bacteria, especially the ones living in the roots of particular plant families – like the pea family (legumes). Farmers realised that legumes like clover had a special property which made soils richer, allowed more crops to grow, and more animals to feed from them. And chemists were starting to identify the atoms and molecules at work under the surface.


Nitrate Wars

As the British and Spanish Empires expanded across the globe, Explorers in the 1830s discovered that there were a few very special islands which were incredibly rich sources of Nitrogen. These were the guano islands – found in places where deep ocean current brough Nitrogen-rich matter up from the ocean floor, which created massive numbers of fish, which were eaten by sea-birds, who created islands, literally made up of their own excretions. Guano islands were discovered off the coast of South America, Southern Africa, in the Caribbean (including the lair of the James Bond villain, Dr No)  and in the Pacific.

Realising that this resource of Nitrogen could provide the answer to increasing food production back home, these islands were mined, and the guano sent back to the homeland for use in farming.

Descriptions of these places suggest they were hell-holes, with bonded labour or slaves used to mine the stinky bird pooh – but they were also extremely lucrative, with fortunes quickly won and lost.  A few decades later, deposits of Nitrate-rich rock (Caliche) were discovered in Chile, and this led to a Nitrate boom with Chilean Nitrate exported across the world. It also ignited a Nitrate war between Bolivia, Peru and Chile.

By now there was a new but also big demand for Nitrate – to create explosives for use in warfare. Saltpetre (Potassium Nitrate) is one of the three compounds which form gunpowder, but it was hard to make. Gunpowder was originally invented by the Chinese, but the technology arrived in Europe during the late Middle Ages, transforming war.

In England from Tudor times onwards, Saltpetermen (from the Worshipful Company of Salters) were tasked with collecting it from places where it “grew” – cellars, pigeon-houses and stables – the terrestrial equivalent of those guano islands. The Saltpetermen had special powers to enter private property and collect the saltpeter, and this created all sorts of problems, including possibly contributing to the reasons behind the English Civil War.

The Chilean Nitrate became more important as the guano deposits were exhausted, and the race was on to find some other way of producing Nitrogen usable for farming. During the First World War, Germany’s imports of Chilean Nitrate (needed for their armaments industry) dried up, as the naval blockade of their few sea-ports really took hold.

During the first years of the 20th century, Fritz Haber, a German Chemist, had developed a process to create Ammonia from Nitrogen and Hydrogen, without the need for N-fixing bacteria or rare mineral deposits. This was then transformed into an industrial process called the Haber-Bosch process, allowing Germany to manufacture Nitrate for explosives and the war to continue, killing millions more. Haber went on to become the father of chemical warfare, developing poison gases. Such is the two-edged sword of chemistry.

Capturing Fertility

Even more significant than his military discoveries, was the fact that the Haber-Bosch process suddenly removed the natural limit on available Nitrogen for farming. It wasn’t until after the Second World War that artificial Nitrogen fertilisers became widely available, but once that moment arrived, farming was utterly transformed (and overnight the Chilean Nitrate boom was dead.)

Without too much thought for the consequences (other than increasing food production), Nitrogen fertilisers, were used everywhere they could be used. Food production shot up, to the point now where it is estimated that half the global food supply is produced using N fertilisers. It’s arguable that Fritz Haber is the person whose discovery had the biggest influence over the human population explosion of the 20th and 21st century.

But there’s been another consequence, one which is now among the greatest environmental problems facing us and the Planet – there is now too much reactive Nitrogen swilling around. For the past 60 years farmers have been putting on more Nitrogen than the crop plants can take up. The excess ends up in soils, in water and in the air. The problems this excess cause are collectively called Eutrophication.

Nitrates from fertilisers leach through the ground ending up in human water supplies – a serious this problem as Nitrates cause cancer. But this leaching can take decades so the fertiliser applies in the 1970s might only now be reaching the underground aquifer which provides water to your tap.

And Nitrate fertiliser, slurry or manure applied to fields ends up in rivers causing wildlife to die. Poole Harbour – the Dorset home of Lush HQ – is suffering from too much Nitrogen flowing down the rivers which feed into it; the excess N causes ‘mats’ of algae to form, which has knock-on effects on plants, invertebrates and the internationally important populations of birds there.

Nitrates in the soil encourage plants which benefit from high Nitrate levels (called Nitrophiles) to take over, replacing the vast majority of wild plants which prefer very low Nitrogen levels. This is why our road verges and field edges are now dominated by nettles, cow parsley and hogweed; and one of the reasons why so many wild plants are disappearing from the countryside.

Ammonia, which is a reactive gas, is released from intensive farming practices – dairy farming, the use of fertiliser on fields, plus pig and poultry units, all contribute to Ammonia in the air. This causes air pollution, sometimes a long way from where the Ammonia has been emitted.

And there are other sources – Nitrogen Oxides are also very toxic and formed by both industrial processes and vehicle exhausts.

Some efforts have been made to tackle these widespread problems of too much reactive Nitrogen. The EU introduced a Nitrates Directive 27-years-ago, but all its good intentions have done little to tackle the problem.

Kicking up a stink

The UK Government has been taken to court repeatedly over its failure to tackle air pollution, which is reckoned to cause 40,000 premature deaths in the UK every year. Not all of these are due to Nitrogen – but a combination of Ammonia from farm sources, and Nitrogen Oxides from Industry and Transport, are very significant contributors.

It is this context in which Michael Gove made his latest of the many announcements of the changes he wants to make to the UK’s environment – a Clean Air Strategy. The Strategy includes proposals which would limit the total amount of Nitrogen a farmer could apply to their fields; introduce a requirement to cover all slurry lagoons and manure heaps (to prevent Ammonia escaping) and also introduce a permit system – which currently only applies to Pig and Poultry farms – to large Dairy farms. These are welcome moves, particularly the limit on total N applied across all farms. Will it be enough? Of course not, but these are steps in the right direction.

In truth, the problem is now so great that, combined with the other global threats to our future, we need to recognise some home truths. The reactive Nitrogen genie is well and truly out of the bottle. And even if everyone stopped creating new reactive Nitrogen, it would take decades, centuries, perhaps millennia for equilibrium to return (think of those Nitrogen-rich deposits at the bottom of the ocean and how long it took to create the Guano Islands).

While some farming systems are able to grow food without artificial Nitrogen (Organic and other forms of Regenerative Agriculture) we have to start developing systems which actively remove all that excess Nitrogen, which is so damaging for nature, and for our own health.

Given that half the world’s food is grown using artificial fertiliser, can we sustain our current human population without using artificial Nitrogen? This will be one of the greatest challenges of the future.

this article first appeared on the Lush Times website.

About Miles King

UK conservation professional, writing about nature, politics, life. All views are my own and not my employers. I don't write on behalf of anybody else.
This entry was posted in Agriculture policy, agrochemicals, eutrophication, No Tern Unstoned and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to The Nitrogen Dilemma

  1. Interesting article, thank you.
    Brings back memories of the Carl Bosch Museum in Heidelberg – see photos at

  2. Many matters of concern, but I am surprised to find nitrate in drinking water among them. What is the highest level of nitrate in reservoirs or their feeders, and how does it compare, for example, to bacon?

    • John Kay says:

      Nitrate in drinking water was a Project Fear in the mid-80s. You would be extremely unlikely to find a GP in this country (then or now) who has seen a case of infant methaemoglobinaemia outside of a textbook. The statutory limit for nitrate in drinking water (at the tap) is 50ppm. The content in bacon is about 1200ppm. The content in beetroot is about 5000ppm. The rate of conversion of nitrate to nitrite is said to be mitigated by vitamin C, so perhaps a BLT sandwich is an excellently balanced food.

      • Miles King says:

        thanks John. If Nitrate in drinking water is Project Fear, why are the water companies spending a great deal of their consumers’ money (and probably some general taxation funds as well) trying to avoid nitrate entering water supplies?

  3. John Kay says:

    Because delivery of water with nitrate not exceeding 50mg/l is the law, it’s not optional, and it’s cheaper to reduce unwanted nitrate at source than it is to strip it out at the water treatment stage. Using the fear of Blue Baby Syndrome to drive the Nitrate Directive was a cynical tactic irrelevant for countries with low reliance on private sources for drinking water. The greater benefit to the public was to be had from driving down eutrophication of waters. The EU has focused regulatory control of eutrophication on nitrate whereas phosphate is often the first limiting nutrient – but more difficult to control when there is so much casual, unregulated everyday water pollution from industry and domestic wastepipes in addition to particulate pollution from agriculture.

    This was doing the rounds recently: B. Z. Houlton, S. L. Morford, R. A. Dahlgren. Convergent evidence for widespread rock nitrogen sources in Earth’s surface environment. Science, 2018; 360 (6384): 58 DOI: 10.1126/science.aan4399

    • Miles King says:

      thanks John, though it has to be said that the Nitrates Directive has not been particularly (or indeed even marginally) effective in reducing eutrophication, either in soils, or in water bodies.

  4. Living Soils says:

    Thanks for the post. Very informative.

  5. Julian Jones says:

    Many thanks for great and comprehensive posting.

    The nitrates over spilling from farming practices represent an outrageous and appalling waste of / and unwarranted damage to public & private resources – from an industry that constantly holds out a begging bowl for even more resources.

    Artificial NPK manufacture is extremely energy intensive, and expensive – to ‘lose’ the majority of that applied to the wider environment is wholly irresponsible.

    Traditional farming systems are perfectly able to grow food commercially without artificial Nitrogen inputs, are being constantly improved and some also have extremely positive aspects; eg like creating the centuries old persisting humus in the case of Pre-Colombian Terra Preta. In Europe Biodynamic farming achieves the similar benefits, with comparable productivity to chemical agriculture when correctly implemented, both in temperate and arid regions.

    Nitrates Directive has not been effective because those plant fertilization practices that cause aquatic nitrate contamination (using artificial NPK or un-composted manures) are still allowed.
    This is not complicated … with 69% of NVZs showing no nitrates reductions I can only conclude these are a form of ‘racket’.

    Those traditional farming methods, using composts and rain water harvesting, which already feed many around the world, are also uniquely capable of reversing the damage done to over 50% of the planet’s land surface by many past millennia of human interventions.

  6. KragRags says:

    Very interesting and informative. Than you.

  7. murray marr says:

    Thanks for this very useful article and helping to raise public awareness of the man-made ‘nitrocene’ era.

  8. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot – Planet News

  9. Pingback: Pressenza - The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy

  10. Pingback: Pressenza - ¿La mejor manera de salvar el planeta? Gota de carne y productos lácteos

  11. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot -

  12. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | Ebook Vault

  13. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | BBQ Videos Galore

  14. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | HEALTH MIRACLE

  15. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | AllAbout

  16. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | Daily Buzz Click

  17. Geo Faulk says:

    Excellent: May I suggest the next topic , rather than get too fixated on Nitrogen (NOx, NH3 ) can you turn our attention to Sulphur ( S8, SOx ) as the up and coming pollutant. Is it this that is making xylella like symptoms on all the leaves ??

  18. Geo faulk says:

    Certainly that used to be the case ; I do not think so now. Perhaps you might like to visit sulphur pollution and the xylella like symptoms on the leaves of many plants. Perhaps you might be able to link this with the loss of the insects?

  19. Pingback: Il miglior modo per salvare il pianeta? Lasciate perdere carne e latticini | NUTesla | The Informant

  20. Pingback: Il miglior modo per salvare il pianeta? Lasciate perdere carne e latticini – paolo politi

  21. Pingback: Going Vegan? « Flexible Reality

  22. Pingback: George Monbiot: Butchery of the Planet | Vox Populi

  23. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | AllAbout NEwsBolg

  24. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | Business and News Daily

  25. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | Advices , News

  26. Pingback: On plant-based diets! – Learning from Dogs

  27. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot – Best Aquariu Museum

  28. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot | AllAbout2 FreshNews

  29. Pingback: The best way to save the planet? Drop meat and dairy | George Monbiot - Health Tips

  30. Pingback: La mejor forma de salvar el planeta? El descenso de carne y lácteos

  31. Pingback: Some thoughts on the Oxford Real Farming Conference 2019 | a new nature blog

  32. Pingback: Climate Action, food and farming: a seismic shift for the NFU? | a new nature blog

  33. Avery B says:

    Appreciate your bloog post

Leave a Reply to KragRags Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.